Categories: Design Thinking

Fat Problems

Previously we talked about Skinny Problems. They’re easy to identify and solve. In contrast, Fat Problems are not so easily solved. And, they require a wider focus and possibly design thinking to do so.

WE prefer skinny problems

Our thinking uses up so much energy, our brains have evolved to use shortcuts. As a result our brains are lazy – they look for predictable or easy solutions. Therefore we naturally prefer skinny problems. And one of our weaknesses is that we often see fat problems in skinny ways. This doesn’t work very well for the following reasons…

Less easily solved

Skinny problems are easy. Fat ones are not. Think of a complex maths problem. It’s solve-able and not easily.

Cause and Effect are NOT obvious

With Fat Problems, it’s not so easy to see what is causing the effect. With terrorism and the events of 9/11, it was clearly caused by a bunch of guys hijacking a plane and crashing it into a building. Whilst tracking down those responsible is part of a short-term solution, it may not prevent a similar event from occurring again. The real question to ask is: What motivated them to do it? When you find the source, you can solve the problem more effectively.

Involves multiple Domains

In the case of terrorism, it’s not just a political and military problem, it’s also a social one. Plus, it’s a global issue that involves different cultures, laws in different countries, different languages and different religious beliefs. A complex melting pot!

[Tweet “What’s the difference between a Skinny Problem and a Fat Problem?”]

Fat Problems require a wider view

Fat Problems are not solved by Skinny Thinking.

Skinny Thinking is like using a telephoto lens. It allows you to get up close and it narrows your attention.

In contrast, Fat Thinking requires a wide-angle lens. It allows you to have a wider, more distant view. This way we see more of the context or landscape in which the subject is standing in.

When faced with a problem we need to choose what to focus on. Think of it as framing your photo. Do you want a close up of the subject’s face with no background? Or, do you want their entire body standing in the wider landscape? Are you focusing on the forest or the trees?

Source: Book Rapper, Wicked Thinking. Derived from Eric Knight’s book Reframe.

 More…

Geoff McDonald

Share
Published by
Geoff McDonald

Recent Posts

7 Essential Qualities Every Signature System Needs

If your signature system doesn’t have all seven of these qualities, you’re leaving money on…

3 days ago

Monetize Your Expertise: Cookie Cutter vs Signature System

What’s the best way to monetize your expertise after 45? Is it a cookie-cutter, custom…

1 week ago

The Hidden Cost of NOT Having a Signature Method

Are you pouring your expertise into your business, working harder every year… but still feel…

2 weeks ago

Why Your Personal Brand Fails Without This One Thing

Most personal brands fail. Why? Because they’re forgettable. They sound like everyone else, attract no…

3 weeks ago

How to Create Your Signature System in 7 Steps

Most experts struggle to monetize their expertise — not because they lack skill, but because…

4 weeks ago

How to Turn Your Personal Manifesto Into a Six Figure Business

What if your personal manifesto could become a six- or even seven-figure business? Stephen Covey…

1 month ago